The Planning Commission recommends the City Council take the following actions:
1. Determine that Specific Plan Amendment No. 2026-01 does not require further environmental review in accordance with Section 15183 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines; and
2. Adopt a Resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-132
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BANNING, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 26-0001 TO AMEND TABLE 3-1 OF THE SUNSET CROSSROADS SPECIFIC PLAN AND MAKE A DETERMINATION THAT SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 26-0001 DOES NOT REQUIRE FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 15183 OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) GUIDELINES
October 13, 2026 Council Meeting Summary:
SPA No. 26-0001 (amendment to Table 3-1 of the Sunset Crossroads SP) was scheduled (and advertised) for the October 13, 2026 City Council meeting for review and consideration by the Council. Staff recommended this agenda item be continued to the October 27, 2026 Council meeting, since the CEQA Section 15183 Consistency Analysis memo prepared for SPA No. 26-0001 was inadvertently left out from the October 13 report packet. Prior to voting on the continuance, the City Council took public testimony on the proposed SPA 26-0001. Approximately 15 speakers provided various comments on agenda item. After Council discussion, Council voted 5-0 to continue the public hearing to the October 27, 2026 meeting. This missing CEQA Section 15183 Consistency Analysis memo has now been added to the report packet for Council review and consideration (refer to Attachment 6).
Project Background:
The Sunset Crossroads Specific Plan project was approved by the City Council on March 10, 2026, and included approval of Specific Plan No. 20-2002, General Plan Amendment No. 20-2501, Zone Change No. 20-3502, Tentative Parcel Map No. 38118, and Development Agreement. Council's approval also included certification of the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the project (SCH No. 2021020011). During the Planning Commission and City Council public hearings, Commissioners and Councilmembers (as well as the general public) expressed their concerns regarding the allowing industrial buildings in the specific plan area that could be used for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detention facilities, Data Centers, and Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS). It was believed that these specific uses can create significant land use and environmental impacts and are not a desirable use to be allowed within the Sunset Crossroads Specific Plan. Therefore, the applicant, NP Banning Industrial LLC, in recognizing these concerns, committed to processing a minor specific plan amendment to prohibit these uses. Hence, the submittal of Specific Plan Amendment No. 26-0001. The Applicant has submitted a “Justification Letter” acknowledging their intent and understanding in this regard (refer to Attachment 3).
Planning Commission Meeting Summary:
The Planning Commission reviewed the proposed SPA 26-0001 at its September 2, 2026 meeting. There were approximately 13 speakers that provided various public comments on the proposed amendment to Table 3-1 of the Crossroads Specific Plan. After questions from the Commission to Staff and Commission discussion on the proposed amendment, Commissioner Marshall made a motion to adopt PC Resolution No. 2026-03 recommending City Council approval of SPA 26-0001 with the additional request to prohibit cold storage uses in the specific plan. Before a second to the motion could be made, Chair Castorena made an alternative motion to continue SPA 26-0001 to a future meeting and asked Planning staff to create definitions of the uses proposed to be prohibited as part of the amendment. Chair Castorena's motion did not receive a second confirmation from the other Commissioners, thus, the motion failed.
Commissioner Marshall's original motion then prevailed which was seconded by Commissioner Valdiserri. A roll call vote followed with a 4 - 1 (Castorena voting no) decision to adopt PC Resolution No. 2026-03 recommending City Council approval of SPA 26-0001 with the additional request to prohibit cold storage uses in the specific plan. The proposed Table 3-1 has been amended per the Commission's recommendation and is reflected in the attached Council Resolution (Exhibit 1).
Project Summary/Analysis:
NP Banning Industrial, LLC submitted their Specific Plan Amendment No. 26-0001 on June 15, 2026, proposing to amend Table 3-1 to prohibit ICE Detention Facilities and Data Centers in the General Commercial and Industrial land use districts of the SP, and to allow the use of a BESS systems in the Industrial land use district as an ancillary use to a primary industrial use (i.e., not as a primary/stand-alone use) when required by the California Building Code. Stand-alone BESS facilities are already prohibited in Table 3-1 for the General Commercial SP District. The amended Table 3-1 reflecting these proposed changes is provided as Exhibit A to Council Resolution No. 2026-132 (Attachment 1). The changes are noted in red color font and highlighted in yellow.
Detention facilities, data centers, and stand-alone BESS facilities/systems are incompatible with the other permitted and conditionally permitted uses outlined in Table 3-1 of the Specific Plan as they could significantly impact other retail commercial and light industrial uses across the specific plan project area. A detention facility, data center, and BESS facility/system (stand-alone) would also likely result in significant local impacts and create nuisance concerns within the specific plan project area and surrounding neighborhoods.
At-Risk Determination:
The Applicant has submitted an At-Risk letter (Attachment 4) recognizing that the adopted Sunset Crossroads Specific Plan and Development Agreement approved by City Council (Ordinance No. 1618, 1619, and 1620) are subject to a current local referendum that will be placed on the November 3, 2026, general election. Although there is a referendum in process, the City Attorney has confirmed that the Applicant may proceed with this specific plan amendment.
Recognizing the Sunset Crossroads Specific Plan (including the proposed amendment) is effected by the referendum and could not be officially effective until the outcome of the referendum is determined on November 3, 2026, the City Attorney has recommended special language be added to Council Resolution No. 2026-132 that will “stay” the effective date of the Council Resolution (if approved) until after the outcome of the November 3, 2026, vote and certification of the three ballot measures. The specific language the City Attorney is recommending reads as follows (refer to Section 5 of the Resolution):
“This City Council Resolution No. 2026-132 approving the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 26-0001 is contingent upon approval of Ordinances Nos. 1618, 1619, and 1620 by the electorate which are subject to a referendum vote on November 3, 2026. It is recommended that if ballot Measures U, V, and W all receive a majority “Yes” vote, then the City Council approval of the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 26-0001 via this Resolution should become effective 15 days after certification of the November 3, 2026, election. It is also recommended that should the Measures receive a majority “No” vote, then the City Council approvals of Specific Plan Amendment No. 26-0001 via this resolution should be null and void.”
In summary, the Commission supported (4-1 vote) the proposed amendment to the Sunset Crossroads Specific Plan to prohibit ICE Detention Facilities, Data Centers and Cold Storage uses in the General Commercial and Industrial land use districts of the SP, and to allow the use of a BESS system in the Industrial land use district as an ancillary use to a primary industrial use (i.e., not as a primary/stand-alone use) when required by the California Building Code and has recommended City Council approval.
Required SPA Findings:
In accordance with Section 17.96.060 of the Banning Municipal Code, the City Council, upon recommendation of the Planning Commission, is required to make four (4) findings to approve the proposed specific plan amendment. The Planning Commission in their review of SPA 26-0001 recommended the City Council make the followings findings to approve SPA No. 26-0001:
A. The proposed plan is consistent with the General Plan.
Evidence: The Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the City’s General Plan in that adding prohibited uses and limiting certain uses outlined in Table 3-1 will ensure the project will continue to avoid adverse impacts, while allowing economic growth opportunities and balancing land use, circulation, housing, and economic development priorities within specific plan project. Further, the amendment to Table 3-1 to prohibit ICE Detention Facilities and Data Centers, and to limit BESS systems will continue to support development and job creation opportunities within the specific plan area as encouraged and continue to align with policies related to walkability, infrastructure upgrades, and community amenities in the General Plan.
B. The proposed plan would not be detrimental to the environment, or to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City.
Evidence: An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared and certified (SCH No. 2021020011) for the Sunset Crossroads Specific Plan project that identified potentially significant impacts and included mitigation measures to reduce impacts to less than significant where feasible. The City Council determined that, with mitigation and overriding considerations, the plan would not be detrimental to the environment or public interest, health, safety, or welfare. The adopted Statement of Overriding Considerations as allowed by CEQA guidelines maintains the projects’ long-term economic and community benefits. Additionally, consistent with state law requirements, the approved Specific Plan achieves a comprehensive plan for land use, circulation and infrastructure within the specific plan area and surrounding area to ensure the project accommodates necessary utilities and services to protect the public interest, health safety, convenience and welfare.
C: The subject property is physically suitable for the requested land use designation(s) and the anticipated development(s).
Evidence: The property continues to be physically suitable for the intended permitted and conditionally permitted land uses. The site is largely undeveloped, has appropriate access to major roadways, and will be served by necessary infrastructure improvements (e.g., sewer, water, streets). The project underwent geotechnical, hydrology, and environmental analyses, during the EIR review, that confirmed suitability for the scale and type of development. The proposed amendment will prohibit and limit incompatible land uses that are not physically suitable for the Plan area.
D: The proposed plan amendment shall ensure development of desirable character which will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding neighborhood.
Evidence: The Sunset Crossroads Specific Plan project design reflects desirable and compatible land uses and features, incorporating landscaping, architectural standards, buffers, and traffic planning. Adjacent uses include residential, commercial, and institutional land uses, and the project includes transitions in use intensity and design to ensure compatibility. The proposed amendment will prohibit and limit incompatible land uses that are inconsistent with the desirable character of the Plan area and the surrounding neighborhood.
CEQA Section 15183 Determination:
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Cal. Pub. Res. Code § 21000 et seq.), the State Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15000 et seq.), the Applicant has prepared a CEQA Section 15183 Consistency Analysis memo for SPA No. 26-0001 which was reviewed by planning staff. A copy of the consistency memo was inadvertently left out of the October 13, 2026 Council agenda packet but has now been provided for Council consideration (refer to Attachment 6, CEQA Sec 15183 Consistency Analysis Memo, August 2026). The memorandum describes and evaluates the proposed minor modifications to Table 3-1 of the Specific Plan to "exclude and clarify" certain potential uses permitted within the Development Project Site and confirms that the scope of the proposed SPA falls within the scope of the Specific Plan FEIR (SCH No. 2021020011). Accordingly, the proposed SPA was evaluated pursuant to Section 15183 of the State of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines to determine whether its environmental effects were adequately addressed in the Specific Plan FEIR, and whether any project-specific effects require additional environmental review.
As demonstrated in the memorandum, the proposed SPA falls within the development density analyzed in the certified Specific Plan FEIR and is consistent with the applicable land use and development assumptions originally evaluated. In addition, the proposed SPA would not result in any new significant environmental effects that were not previously analyzed, nor would it substantially increase the severity of the previously identified impacts. Therefore, pursuant to Sections 15183 and 15162 of the state CEQA Guidelines, the environmental effects associated with the proposed SPA 26-0001 have been adequately addressed in the Specific Plan FEIR, and no additional environmental review is required under CEQA. Thus, the City may rely upon the prior environmental analysis in taking action on the proposed SPA 26-0001. Upon approval, Staff will file a Notice of Exemption (NOE) for the proposed SPA 26-0001 within 5 working days of Council's action in accordance with CEQA statutes.
Notice of Public Hearing (October 13, 2026 meeting):
In accordance with Chapter 17.96.030 and 17.68 of the Banning Municipal Code, the Planning Department on September 18, 2026, published a notice of public hearing in the Record Gazette, a local newspaper of general circulation within the City of Banning, notifying the general public of the October 13, 2026 City Council meeting at which time the City Council would be considering action on Specific Plan Amendment No. 26-0001. In addition, the same notice of public hearing was also mailed to property owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site, including the Sunlakes HOA, notifying all the adjacent property owners of the October 13, 2026 City Council meeting at which time the City Council would be considering action on Specific Plan Amendment No. 26-0001. A copy of the public hearing notice is provided in Attachment 5 of the report packet.
Notice of Public Hearing (October 27, 2026 meeting):
Since the City Council continued action on this agenda item for SPA 26-0001 to a date specific (i.e., 10/27/26), no new public hearing notice is required to be mailed out to residents or published in the Record Gazette. The city did receive public comment letters in regard to the October 13, 2026 meeting which were provided to Councilmembers. The City's manual of procedures provides that all persons interested in commenting on an agenda item being heard by the Legislative Body (in this case the City Council) is entitled to submit written evidence or remarks, as well as other graphic evidence. All such evidence presented at the October 13, 2026 Council meeting shall be retained by the Clerk/Secretary as part of the record of the administrative proceedings.
None.